On 02/14/2012 08:07 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 07:12:29PM +0100, Richard Ems wrote: >> # /net/c3m/usr/local/software/XFS/summarise_stat.pl /bin/ >> 9 6.2% are scripts (shell, perl, whatever) >> 65 44.8% don't use any stat() family calls at all >> 61 42.1% use 32-bit stat() family interfaces only >> 9 6.2% use 64-bit stat64() family interfaces only >> 1 0.7% use both 32-bit and 64-bit stat() family interfaces >> >> So I was not sure if I should use inode64 or not. > > Are you on a 32-bit system (userspace, kernel doesn't matter)? No, I have been running on 64-bit systems for years. That output above is on openSUSE 12.1 64-bit. > If the system is 64-bit even the plain stat handles 64-bit inodes just > fine. With *plain stat* you mean the *32-bit stat* listed above ? Is it then safe to switch all XFS partitions to be mounted with inode64 on 64-bit systems? Also for NFS v3 exports? >From the XFS FAQ I read that it should work, also for NFS v3, and that I can try it and switch back if there are problems, so I will give it a try! Many thanks again for your time and help! Richard -- Richard Ems mail: Richard.Ems@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cape Horn Engineering S.L. C/ Dr. J.J. Dómine 1, 5º piso 46011 Valencia Tel : +34 96 3242923 / Fax 924 http://www.cape-horn-eng.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
