Hi Stephen, On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 08:17:09AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:01:37 -0600 Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:05:33AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:12:44 -0600 Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > Could you pull XFS updates from > > > > > > > > git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git for-next > > > > > > > > instead of from the oss/master branch for 3.3? > > > > > > OK, currently I fetch the "master" branch of that tree. And you want em > > > to switch to the "for-next" branch, right? (Those two branches currently > > > point to the same commit, so I have not changed yet.) > > > > Yep, please switch to oss/for-next instead of oss/master. I'll keep > > them in sync normally, it's just that I'd like to have a little > > flexability WRT what is in for-next. > > Just to be crystal clear: there are no branches in that tree called > "oss/for-next" or "oss/master" - I assume that you are referring to the > branches called "for-next" and "master", right? I am referring to for-next and master branches, at git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git. Sorry I wasn't very clear. Thanks, Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
