Hey Stephen, On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:05:33AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:12:44 -0600 Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Could you pull XFS updates from > > > > git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git for-next > > > > instead of from the oss/master branch for 3.3? > > OK, currently I fetch the "master" branch of that tree. And you want em > to switch to the "for-next" branch, right? (Those two branches currently > point to the same commit, so I have not changed yet.) Yep, please switch to oss/for-next instead of oss/master. I'll keep them in sync normally, it's just that I'd like to have a little flexability WRT what is in for-next. > Did you mean "3.3", or "3.4"? I meant only that I'd like to try it this way for a single release, see how it goes, and then re-evaluate. > Currently the contacts for that tree are: David Chinner > <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx. Should I change that? > i.e. who has control over the tree and can fix problems if I report them? I think Dave's suggestion is reasonable: Keep him as a contact, add me, and s/xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx/xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx/. It really helps that you two are in the same timezone. ;) Thanks, Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
