On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 11:30 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote: > On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 10:14 -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 12:42:21PM -0600, Chandra Seetharaman wrote: > > > while running test case 234 from xfstests test suite, I was getting an > > > occational memory fault in inode_has_perm() with the following stack > > > > Interesting. Given that have no good way to free other data with the > > normal inode callback it looks like we indeed need to do this > > separately. > > > > What about IMA or similar monsters? Posix ACLs already are covered at > > least. > > Looks like a similar problem exists with the 'iint'. I walked thru the code and saw integrity_iint_find() is the one that would be used to see if a iint data structure is associated. And, all all the invocations of integrity_iint_find() check for NULL and handle it properly. I might be wrong since I am not familiar with the code. Can you please double check and let me know if I am wrong. Chandra > > Mimi > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
