On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 12:29:08PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 10:07:12AM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > > To what extent did you test this one? Anything in particular I should > > look for when I test it? > > Create a large filesystem, mount it using -o inode64 on a 32-bit kernel, > find an inode that actually uses more than 32-bits, and try to access > it from an nfs client. > > Alternatively you could probably reproduce it using the open by handle > system calls, I have an idea how to turn that into a test case for > xfstests using a large loopback filesystem. I tested this on a pair of i386 boxes with a large loop filesystem and inode64. Without the fix I got ESTALE on any inodes > 32 bits, and with the patch it works great. Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
