Hey Greg, The last mailing of this patch set went AWOL. Here's another whirl. Greg K-H wrote: > Was stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on the to: line? If so, I should have seen them > through that, but I don't, which is worrysome to me. I thought so. > The 3.0 series is already in the last 3.0.11 release, so I don't need them, I > think I need the 3.1 patches, right? Affirmative. You only need the 3.1 patches, here they are: --- This is a series of XFS fixes from current mainline which are important for 3.1-stable. Note that it is the same patch set that Christoph submitted for 3.0-stable, minus the first three patches which are already included in 3.1. My QA came out ok with these six patches atop 3.1.y. Thanks! Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
