On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:54:18AM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > Hey Greg, > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:48:29PM +0900, Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 06:00:43AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 03:38:07PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > > > > This is a series of XFS fixes from current mainline which is important for > > > > 3.1-stable. Note that it is the same patch set that Christoph submitted for > > > > 3.0-stable, minus the first three patches which are already included in 3.1. > > > > > > > > My QA came out ok with these six patches atop 3.1.y. Apologies to those who > > > > got this mail twice. > > > > > > The updates looks good to me. > > > > I never saw this series once, can someone please resend them as I don't > > see them anywhere. > > The first time I sent this 3.1.y series you were not on the --to=, which > is why some people got the series twice but you didn't. Sorry for the > confusion. Was stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on the to: line? If so, I should have seen them through that, but I don't, which is worrysome to me. > Do you need the series for 3.0 to be resubmitted? The 3.0 series is already in the last 3.0.11 release, so I don't need them, I think I need the 3.1 patches, right? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
