On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:05:54AM -0800, Simon Kirby wrote: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:32:41AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:56:43AM -0800, Simon Kirby wrote: > > > Sorry for the delay in testing. > > > > > > Yes, everything looks fine even with the xfs_log_force line from your > > > patch commented out. So, the changes in xfs_reclaim_inode() are just the > > > set_bit(XBT_FORCE_FLUSH) and wake_up_process(), relative to 3.1. > > > > Dave pointed out that we can do better than the big hammer, and the > > patch below should fix your issue, too. Can you test it? > > Yes, seems to be fine. No hung task warnings, tested for ~5 days. Thanks a lot for the testing Simon. Ben, can you add a: Tested-by: Simon Kirby <sim@xxxxxxxxxx> to the patch when applying it? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
