On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 05:03:24PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Sorry Simon, > > I haven't really been able to get back to this as fast as I wanted to > do. Can you do another run and check if the patch still helps your > issue even if you remove the xfs_log_force line? Hello! Sorry for the delay in testing. Yes, everything looks fine even with the xfs_log_force line from your patch commented out. So, the changes in xfs_reclaim_inode() are just the set_bit(XBT_FORCE_FLUSH) and wake_up_process(), relative to 3.1. Simon- _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
