On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Amit Sahrawat <amit.sahrawat83@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In my opinion, this is not the way to allocate memory and use for > O_DIRECT approach. Instead you can make use of valloc() or > posix_memalign()/memalign > Or if you are still using malloc() - then you probably did the right > thing by allocating for alignment like malloc(size + 4096); > but, store this is permanent pointer and make use of aligned pointer : > perm_pointer = malloc(size +4096); > For aligning you need an expression like this: > align_pointer = (perm_pointer + 4096) & ~(4095);// If you wish to > align for 512, do it like (p+512) & ~(511); Thanks. I adjusted the test application, but still see the bug with RT subvolumes and direct writes. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
