On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 04:07:33PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > > + xfs_iunpin(ip); > > + > > This initially struck me as unsafe or something, > assuming the inode was pinned. But I was thinking > of it more like an unlock request, which it is not. > It's more like unplugging something so the inode > will eventually get unpinned. (Just thinking aloud > here, nevermind me...) After the next series I am about to post there will be just one caller of xfs_iunpin left. We can probably simply fold it at that point. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
