On Fri, 29 Jul 2011, Bryan Schumaker wrote:
How does this look for printing out more information when a cookie loop is detected? Is there anything else that should be printed out? My patch applies on top of Trond's from yesterday.
Hi, This fails against 2.6.38: patching file fs/nfs/dir.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 134. Hunk #2 FAILED at 173. Hunk #3 FAILED at 323. Hunk #4 FAILED at 336. Hunk #5 FAILED at 349. Hunk #6 succeeded at 320 (offset -48 lines). Hunk #7 FAILED at 741. Hunk #8 succeeded at 716 (offset -59 lines). Hunk #9 succeeded at 749 (offset -59 lines). Hunk #10 succeeded at 763 (offset -59 lines). 6 out of 10 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/nfs/dir.c.rej patching file include/linux/nfs_fs.h Hunk #1 FAILED at 99. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/nfs_fs.h.rej atom:/usr/src/linux# And the 3.0 kernel is broken for my wireless adapter: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1411576 If you can make a combined patch for 2.6.38 I can try it, 2.6.39+ have a horrible driver (rt2800usb) and 1 person emailed me as well stating the same thing off-list (they stick with the manufacturer's driver or the *sta one). Justin. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
