On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Justin Piszcz wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 16:54 -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: >> On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 16:37 -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: >>> On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 15:47 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 03:44:20PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 03:35:01PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote: >>>>>>> Currently I do not see any dupes, however I have a script that moves >>>>>>> images out of the directory once an hour: >>>>>>> 0 * * * * /usr/local/bin/move_to_old2.sh > /dev/null 2>&1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you keep adding files to the directory while you move files out? >>>>> Yes, otherwise there are too many files in the directory and viewers, e.g., >>>>> each geeqie (picture viewer) will use > 4-6GB of memory, so I try to keep >>>>> it around 5,000 pictures or less. >>>>> >>>>>> What's the rate of additions/removals to the directory? >>>>> Additions it depends, around 5,000 over a 12hr period, 416/hr, current: >>>>> >>>>> atom:/d1/motion# find cam1|wc >>>>> 5215 5215 166853 >>>>> atom:/d1/motion# find cam2|wc >>>>> 5069 5069 162181 >>>>> atom:/d1/motion# find cam3|wc >>>>> 5594 5594 178981 >>>>> atom:/d1/motion# >>>> >>>> This sounds a lot like xfs simply filling up the directory index slots >>>> of files that you just moved out with new files, and nfs falsely >>>> claiming that this is a problem. >>> >>> Yep. There is an existing bugzilla report for this bug at >>> >>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38572 >>> >>> I have a preliminary patch there that attempts to turn off the loop >>> detection when the directory is seen to change, however that patch still >>> appears to have a bug in it, and I haven't had time to figure out what >>> is wrong yet. >>> >>> Can you perhaps take a look, Bryan? >> >> Actually, Justin, can you test the following slight variant on the patch >> in the bugzilla? > > Doh! This one will actually compile.... Hi, Should I try 3.0 first or retry 2.6.38 w/ this patch? Justin.
I'll give 3.0 a go first. Justin. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
