On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 06:31:26PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 04:50:36PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > From: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > On xfs exports, nfsd is incorrectly returning ENOENT instead of ESTALE > > on attempts to use a filehandle of a deleted file (spotted with pynfs > > test PUTFH3). The ENOENT was coming from xfs_iget. > > With that you mean the ip->i_d.di_mode checks? Given that we should > only be bale to get these from NFS or the handle ioctls I suspect just > turning them into ESTALE should be fine. Bulkstat also checks for ENOENT returns from xfs_iget() as the lookup it does is inherently racy. That is, if the inode is allocated when it is read from the IBT, but then has been unlinked before the actual xfs_iget() call, it expects to get back an ENOENT to tell it the inode has been unlinked and shouldn't be included in the bulkstat output. Otherwise, it returns the error to userspace. So converting the mode checks to return ESTALE definitely has the chance of breaking stuff that uses bulkstat (e.g. xfsdump) because it will return errors now where it previously just skipped the (unlinked) inode. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
