On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 04:49:20PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > xfs_da_grow_inode and xfs_dir2_grow_inode are mostly duplicate code. Factor > the meat of those two functions into a new common helper. Hmmmm. I'm in the process of splitting xfs_dir2_grow_inode() into data space vs free space variants so I can play speculative preallocation tricks in the directory data space to reduce dataspace fragmentation for large directories. Combined with a rework of the readir readahead code, it significantly reduces IO count and seeks for readdir calls... I'll probably just rebase on top of this patch, though, because I did notice that the two functions were very similar to begin with. ;) Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
