On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 11:54:58AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > So rather than deprecating the functionality, perhaps we should look > at implementing it through a simpler, more generic, better > integrated interface? That will increase the usefulness of the > functionality for a much wider audience than it has now, and also > provide the virt/blk throttling folk with exactly the "don't cross > the streams" functionality they suggest filesystems are unable to > support easily..... That does indeed sound simpler, and also more useful. Do the users who have chimed in here (and off list) think such a scheme would be useful for them? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
