On 7/3/11 10:59 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 6/30/11 4:42 PM, kkeller@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >> # uname -a >> Linux sahara.xxx 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 #1 SMP Wed Apr 1 09:10:25 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >> >> Yes, it's not a completely current kernel. This box is running CentOS 5 >> with some yum updates. > > try > > # rpm -qa | grep xfs > > If you see anything with "kmod" you're running an exceptionally old xfs codebase. > > 2.6.18-138 and beyond should have a newer xfs backport built into the kernel > rpm itself, as shipped from Red Hat. But the ancient xfs-kmod (or similar) > provided xfs.ko will take precedence even if you update that kernel. ... unless you uninstall the xfs-kmod package. (i'm not sure how to set precedence of found kernel modules, I guess) -Eric > * Fri Apr 03 2009 Don Zickus <dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx> [2.6.18-138.el5] > ... > - [fs] xfs: update to 2.6.28.6 codebase (Eric Sandeen ) [470845] > > If at all possible I'd try an updated kernel, especially if your xfs.ko > is provided by the very, very, very old centos xfs-kmod rpm. > > -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
