On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:19:29AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > x4 ~ # xfs_info / > > meta-data=/dev/root isize=256 agcount=4, agsize=1949824 blks > > = sectsz=512 attr=2 > > data = bsize=4096 blocks=7799296, imaxpct=25 > > = sunit=128 swidth=128 blks > > naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0 > > log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=3808, version=2 > > = sectsz=512 sunit=8 blks, lazy-count=1 > > realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0 > OK, so the common elements here appears to be root filesystems > with small log sizes, which means they are tail pushing all the > time metadata operations are in progress. Does that mean that such filesystems are not optimal in terms of performance and/or reliability and should have larger log sizes? -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
