On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 09:45:28PM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > On 2011.04.27 at 18:26 +0200, Bruno Prémont wrote: > > On Wed, 27 April 2011 Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 10:44:03PM +0200, Bruno Prémont wrote: > > > > Running 2.6.39-rc3+ and now again on 2.6.39-rc4+ (I've not tested -rc1 > > > > or -rc2) I've hit a "dying machine" where processes writing to disk end > > > > up in D state. > > > > From occurrence with -rc3+ I don't have logs as those never hit the disk, > > > > for -rc4+ I have the following (sysrq+t was too big, what I have of it > > > > misses a dozen of kernel tasks - if needed, please ask): > > > > > > > > The -rc4 kernel is at commit 584f79046780e10cb24367a691f8c28398a00e84 > > > > (+ 1 patch of mine to stop disk on reboot), > > > > full dmesg available if needed; kernel config attached (only selected > > > > options). In case there is something I should do at next occurrence > > > > please tell. Unfortunately I have no trigger for it and it does not > > > > happen very often. > > > > > > > > [ 0.000000] Linux version 2.6.39-rc4-00120-g73b5b55 (kbuild@neptune) (gcc version 4.4.5 (Gentoo 4.4.5 p1.2, pie-0.4.5) ) #12 Thu Apr 21 19:28:45 CEST 2011 > > > > > > > > > > > > [32040.120055] INFO: task flush-8:0:1665 blocked for more than 120 seconds. > > > > [32040.120068] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. > > > > [32040.120077] flush-8:0 D 00000000 4908 1665 2 0x00000000 > > > > [32040.120099] f55efb5c 00000046 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000001 e0382924 00000000 > > > > [32040.120118] f55efb0c f55efb5c 00000004 f629ba70 572f01a2 00001cfe f629ba70 ffffffc0 > > > > [32040.120135] f55efc68 f55efb30 f889d7f8 f55efb20 00000000 f55efc68 e0382900 f55efc94 > > > > [32040.120153] Call Trace: > > > > [32040.120220] [<f889d7f8>] ? xfs_bmap_search_multi_extents+0x88/0xe0 [xfs] > > > > [32040.120239] [<c109ce1d>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x2d/0x110 > > > > [32040.120294] [<f88c88ca>] ? xlog_space_left+0x2a/0xc0 [xfs] > > > > [32040.120346] [<f88c85cb>] xlog_wait+0x4b/0x70 [xfs] > > > > [32040.120359] [<c102ca00>] ? try_to_wake_up+0xc0/0xc0 > > > > [32040.120411] [<f88c948b>] xlog_grant_log_space+0x8b/0x240 [xfs] > > > > [32040.120464] [<f88c936e>] ? xlog_grant_push_ail+0xbe/0xf0 [xfs] > > > > [32040.120516] [<f88c99db>] xfs_log_reserve+0xab/0xb0 [xfs] > > > > [32040.120571] [<f88d6dc8>] xfs_trans_reserve+0x78/0x1f0 [xfs] > > > > > > Hmmmmm. That may be caused by the conversion of the xfsaild to a > > > work queue. Can you post the output of "xfs_info <mntpt>" and the > > > mount options (/proc/mounts) used on you system? > > I may have hit the same problem today and managed to capture some sysrq-l > and sysrq-w output. > > The system was largely unusable during this incident. I could still > switch between X and the console (and press the sysrq key-combination), > but I couldn't run any commands in the terminal. > > > x4 ~ # xfs_info / > meta-data=/dev/root isize=256 agcount=4, agsize=1949824 blks > = sectsz=512 attr=2 > data = bsize=4096 blocks=7799296, imaxpct=25 > = sunit=128 swidth=128 blks > naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0 > log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=3808, version=2 > = sectsz=512 sunit=8 blks, lazy-count=1 > realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0 OK, so the common elements here appears to be root filesystems with small log sizes, which means they are tail pushing all the time metadata operations are in progress. Definitely seems like a race in the AIL workqueue trigger mechanism. I'll see if I can reproduce this and cook up a patch to fix it. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
