Looks good.
----- Original Message -----
> Make sure to only call xfs_iext_get_ext after we've validate the
> extent index
> when moving on to the next index in xfs_bunmapi. Also remove the old
> workaround for too large indices that has been superceeded by the
> proper
> fix in xfs_bmap_del_extent.
>
> Based on an earlier patch from Lachlan McIlroy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
>
> Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c
> ===================================================================
> --- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c 2011-05-11 10:17:04.803235692 +0200
> +++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c 2011-05-11 10:17:06.432734169 +0200
> @@ -5247,17 +5247,17 @@ xfs_bunmapi(
> nodelete:
> /*
> * If not done go on to the next (previous) record.
> - * Reset ep in case the extents array was re-alloced.
> */
> - ep = xfs_iext_get_ext(ifp, lastx);
> if (bno != (xfs_fileoff_t)-1 && bno >= start) {
> - if (lastx >= XFS_IFORK_NEXTENTS(ip, whichfork) ||
> - xfs_bmbt_get_startoff(ep) > bno) {
> - if (--lastx >= 0)
> - ep = xfs_iext_get_ext(ifp, lastx);
> - }
> - if (lastx >= 0)
> + if (lastx >= 0) {
> + ep = xfs_iext_get_ext(ifp, lastx);
> + if (xfs_bmbt_get_startoff(ep) > bno) {
> + if (--lastx >= 0)
> + ep = xfs_iext_get_ext(ifp,
> + lastx);
> + }
> xfs_bmbt_get_all(ep, &got);
> + }
> extno++;
> }
> }
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
