[PATCH 6/9] xfs: do not use unchecked extent indices in xfs_bunmapi

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Make sure to only call xfs_iext_get_ext after we've validate the extent index
when moving on to the next index in xfs_bunmapi.  Also remove the old
workaround for too large indices that has been superceeded by the proper
fix in xfs_bmap_del_extent.

Based on an earlier patch from Lachlan McIlroy.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c
===================================================================
--- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c	2011-05-11 10:17:04.803235692 +0200
+++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c	2011-05-11 10:17:06.432734169 +0200
@@ -5247,17 +5247,17 @@ xfs_bunmapi(
 nodelete:
 		/*
 		 * If not done go on to the next (previous) record.
-		 * Reset ep in case the extents array was re-alloced.
 		 */
-		ep = xfs_iext_get_ext(ifp, lastx);
 		if (bno != (xfs_fileoff_t)-1 && bno >= start) {
-			if (lastx >= XFS_IFORK_NEXTENTS(ip, whichfork) ||
-			    xfs_bmbt_get_startoff(ep) > bno) {
-				if (--lastx >= 0)
-					ep = xfs_iext_get_ext(ifp, lastx);
-			}
-			if (lastx >= 0)
+			if (lastx >= 0) {
+				ep = xfs_iext_get_ext(ifp, lastx);
+				if (xfs_bmbt_get_startoff(ep) > bno) {
+					if (--lastx >= 0)
+						ep = xfs_iext_get_ext(ifp,
+								      lastx);
+				}
 				xfs_bmbt_get_all(ep, &got);
+			}
 			extno++;
 		}
 	}

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux