Thank you very much :)
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: stress_buster <leo1783@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thu, April 7, 2011 10:52:19 PM
Subject: Re: xfsprogs
On 4/7/11 9:04 AM, stress_buster wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My xfs_repair is bit old- 2.9. version.
> I'm considering installing latest available. But just worried because this
> is my production server and has some custom apps built into my OS.
>
> Is upgrading xfs_repair a high risk?
No.
> Also do I need to install latest xfsprogs or anyway only to upgrade
> xfs_repair from the package?
> I'm only would need xfs_repair mostly, so doesnt matter to me leaving
> others-mkfs.xfs etc in xfsprogs at the old version if that minimises the
> risk...
if you really want to try newer xfs_repair only, just build an xfsprogs tree and run from inside the tree.
> Any thoughts?
Just upgrade. ;)
-Eric
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: stress_buster <leo1783@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thu, April 7, 2011 10:52:19 PM
Subject: Re: xfsprogs
On 4/7/11 9:04 AM, stress_buster wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My xfs_repair is bit old- 2.9. version.
> I'm considering installing latest available. But just worried because this
> is my production server and has some custom apps built into my OS.
>
> Is upgrading xfs_repair a high risk?
No.
> Also do I need to install latest xfsprogs or anyway only to upgrade
> xfs_repair from the package?
> I'm only would need xfs_repair mostly, so doesnt matter to me leaving
> others-mkfs.xfs etc in xfsprogs at the old version if that minimises the
> risk...
if you really want to try newer xfs_repair only, just build an xfsprogs tree and run from inside the tree.
> Any thoughts?
Just upgrade. ;)
-Eric
_______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs