On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:34:11PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2010-09/msg00438.html). Firstly, > the missing args->total was causing the initial block to be > allocated from the freespace reserve. Secondly that the NEAR_BNO > allocation should probably be a START_BNO allocation to allow blocks > to be taken from a higher numbered AG. Looking over the use of ->total, isn't the ialloc btree code also incorrect by setting ->total to 0? The actual change looks good to me, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
