On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 08:03:14AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > The series looks good to me. One thing that feels a bit odd is > the xfs_printk.[ch] name - the functions exported to the rest of the > code don't contain prink anyway. Maybe xfs_msg.[ch] or > xfs_message.[ch]? I was struggling for something relevant to call the file - xfs_message.[ch] definitely seems more appropriate. I'll change the name.. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs