Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfs: demultiplex xfs_icsb_modify_counters()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 04:19:20AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:36:41AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > With the conversion to percpu counters, xfs_icsb_modify_counters() really does
> > not need to exist. Convert the inode counter modifications to use a common
> > helper function for the one place that calls them, and add another function for
> > the free block modification and convert all the callers to use that.
> 
> > +xfs_icsb_modify_inodes(
> > +	xfs_mount_t	*mp,
> 
> struct xfs_mount, please.
> 
> > +	int		cntr,
> > +	int64_t		delta,
> > +	int		rsvd)
> 
> the rsvd argument isn't used at all.
> 
> > +{
> > +	int		ret = 0;
> > +
> > +	ASSERT(cntr == XFS_ICSB_ICOUNT || cntr == XFS_ICSB_IFREE);
> > +
> > +	ret = xfs_icsb_add(mp, cntr, delta, 0);
> > +	if (ret < 0) {
> > +		ASSERT(0);
> > +		return XFS_ERROR(EINVAL);
> > +	}
> > +	return 0;
> 
> You could get rdif of the ret argument as we don't care about the
> value.  I also don't think we need the assert here - the caller already
> does one for us.
> 
> > +xfs_icsb_modify_free_blocks(
> > +	xfs_mount_t	*mp,
> 
> same here.

Ok, makes sense. I'll clean it up.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux