----- "Alex Elder" <aelder@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 14:42 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote: > > ----- "Alex Elder" <aelder@xxxxxxx> wrote: > . . . > > > I'm not sure where you sent these patches the first time > > > but I seem to have missed them. In the future please > > > send this sort of thing to the list for review. > > > > They went to the list (thats where hch found 'em), perhaps > > caught in a spam trap at your end or something like that? > > OK, I think I found the problem. You are sending to > "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" and I'm not on that list. Nope, I'm using xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxx I have a vague, distant memory of some list magic Russell setup years ago on oss, to remap linux-xfs@ (old school) to xfs@ (which was voted most popular name of the time). > I'd prefer everyone uses "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx", which seems > to be what most resources I found use as *the* XFS mailing > list. Discussion about this is welcome, but I think > it's best to not have multiple lists for the same purpose. This discussion was had years ago, comes up every few years, & FWIW I don't really care where the list lives... think we all have more useful things to be doing. :) cheers. -- Nathan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
