Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfsprogs: update deb package maintainer, bump version

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:03:26AM -0600, Alex Elder wrote:
> OK, I think I found the problem.  You are sending to
> "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" and I'm not on that list.
> I wasn't even aware of it.  Something in majordomo
> still shows Jim Mostek as having some sort of
> ownership for that list (which would be at least 10
> year old information).
> 
> I'd prefer everyone uses "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx", which seems
> to be what most resources I found use as *the* XFS mailing
> list.  Discussion about this is welcome, but I think
> it's best to not have multiple lists for the same purpose.

Yes, we should have just one list.  My preference would be
linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx as vger doesn't have the various issues
of the SGI mail setup, but the important bit is to concentrate on one.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux