Re: [PATCH 4/4] xfstests: handle filesystems without FIEMAP support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 01:05:31AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:37:01PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
> > Looks good, but I think if the operation is not
> > supported you want to delete both "${fiemapfile}"
> > and "${fiemaplog}".
> > 
> > While you're at it, make use of the "${fiemapfile}"
> > variable in the fiemap-tester command...  (This
> > appears to be a bug in the original test.)
> 
> Updated version below:
> 
> ---
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH 4/4] xfstests: handle filesystems without FIEMAP support
> 
> Do a _notrun in 225 if we get EOPNOSUPP back from FIEMAP instead
> of failing the test.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

Looks good.

Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux