Emmanuel Florac wrote: > > I've used XFS only since 1996 and never looked back - I > still actually miss those sturdy Origin 200 and 2000 :) I've set up > about 2.5 PB of XFS filesystems in the past 5 years so I think it's > quite a significant metric. > > On the other hand I had some problems (fortunately nothing > irremediable) on reiser, ext3 though I used them only sparsely. > Obviously XFS is much more resilient to hardware glitches (I even > recovered most of the data from a RAID-0 array with a failed drive). > 2.5PB... Wow... Those are some of the best points of why to use XFS. Those are really impressive... Always was intrigued by the SGI equipment in the labs when I was at University... Never played with one though. Checked out the specs of those Origin boxes you mention. That was some horsepower for the time. -Cheers, Peter. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/XFS-Filesystem-not-mounting-tp29704010p29714426.html Sent from the Xfs - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
