Re: Calculating swidth On A RAID6 Volume

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:00:51 +0200
Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait:

> I'd say using su+sw is more future proof than swidth+sunit, as 4K
> sector drives will become standard, and then using 512B units will be
> outdated anyway, right?

Absolutely, and furthermore I'm wondering what's happening in the
case where the drives have 4096 bytes blocks; I suppose then sunit
should be expressed as a number of 4096 bytes blocks, and what about
swidth ? the hell if I know :) This is also probably a nice little nest
of coming filesystem bugs to be hatched :=)

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac     |   Direction technique
                    |   Intellique
                    |	<eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
                    |   +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux