Le Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:00:51 +0200 Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait: > I'd say using su+sw is more future proof than swidth+sunit, as 4K > sector drives will become standard, and then using 512B units will be > outdated anyway, right? Absolutely, and furthermore I'm wondering what's happening in the case where the drives have 4096 bytes blocks; I suppose then sunit should be expressed as a number of 4096 bytes blocks, and what about swidth ? the hell if I know :) This is also probably a nice little nest of coming filesystem bugs to be hatched :=) -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique | Intellique | <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | +33 1 78 94 84 02 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs