On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 12:06:50PM -0600, Marc Aurele La France wrote: > On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Mark Vojkovich wrote: > > >>I think I might have located the problem. The server is not reporting the > >>correct drawable in a completion event requested by an Xinerama-fied > >>XShmPutImage request. The attached is a possible fix for that. > > > That works, but I think there's just a typo in the original > >code that keeps it from working the way it was intended. FOR_NSCREENS > >should have been FOR_NSCREENS_BACKWARD. The idea was that it > >counts down and sends the event on the last one (index zero) which > >had the correct drawable. Alot of functions use the BACKWARD > >version for this an similar reasons. > > OK, thanks. There are two instances of FOR_NSCREENS in the original code -- which one is supposed to be changed? And are you saying that changing FOR_NSCREENS will fix the problem alone, or that the patch is also needed? Thanks. -- Phil Dibowitz Systems Architect and Administrator Enterprise Infrastructure / ISD / USC UCC 174 - 213-821-5427
Attachment:
pgpcU0lhZkWpr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
