On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 11:30:57AM +0200, Egbert Eich wrote: >David Dawes writes: > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 02:24:23AM +0200, wim delvaux wrote: > > >It happens when installing 4.3.0 with Xinstall.bin > > > > > >MD5 sums seems to be identical > > > > > >Does anybody know why or have the same experience ? > > > > We occasionally see reports like this, but I don't recall if the > > reason for the problem was found. The extract binary for Linux is > > statically linked. Maybe we need dynamically linked versions? > >Yes, I think that's the problem. Statically linked libc's are not >really static any more as they pull in shared modules. This seems >to be causing trouble. I can build a glibc22-based dynamically linked version (don't have any glibc23 systems here at the moment) and put that up for both the glibc22 and glibc23 bindists if that would help. David -- David Dawes X-Oz Technologies www.XFree86.org/~dawes www.x-oz.com _______________________________________________ XFree86 mailing list XFree86@xxxxxxxxxxx http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
