AF_XDP busy poll receives packets in batches of 8 on i40e

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello everybody,
I'm experiencing a strange problem when running an AF_XDP application with busy poll enabled on a Intel XL710 NIC (i40e driver). The problem can be replicated running the xdpsock kernel sample in rx or l2fwd mode. The first packet I send to the machine is correctly received by the application. After this, packets are only received in batches of 8. If I send 7 packets the application sees nothing, while the 8th one triggers the reception of all 8 packets. Disabling the busy poll mode everything works fine and packets are immediately received as they are sent.

I tried changing kernel (5.12, 5.14 and 5.16) but all present the same problem. I also tried using another NIC, an Intel X540 with ixgbe driver and the problem isn't there, so I guess is NIC/driver related.

I tried monitoring ethtool statistics. When sending packets between 1 and 7 these counters are increased:
stat:           64 (             64) <= port.rx_bytes /sec
stat:            1 (              1) <= port.rx_size_64 /sec
stat:            1 (              1) <= port.rx_unicast /sec
stat:            1 (              1) <= rx_unicast /sec

While the 8th one triggers this updates:
stat:           64 (             64) <= port.rx_bytes /sec
stat:            1 (              1) <= port.rx_size_64 /sec
stat:            1 (              1) <= port.rx_unicast /sec
stat:          477 (            477) <= rx-0.bytes /sec
stat:            8 (              8) <= rx-0.packets /sec
stat:          477 (            477) <= rx_bytes /sec
stat:            8 (              8) <= rx_packets /sec
stat:            1 (              1) <= rx_unicast /sec

As far as I understand the first set of counters are hardware counters, so it makes me think that packets are kept in the NIC and not even sent to memory.

Does anyone have any suggestion on what could be causing this problem? Does enabling busy poll set some flag on the NIC?

Best regards,
Federico Parola



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Fedora Linux Users]     [Linux SCTP]     [DCCP]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux