Re: Sending A Separate Packet Out The TX Path In XDP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Sending A Separate Packet Out The TX Path In XDP
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 11:27:23 +0200
In-reply-to: <389750c6-6a31-fe80-7fa2-56fbec888534@gflclan.com>
References: <d153ed73-3a46-cbf9-c9b7-947926083027@gflclan.com> <87wnsn8oxr.fsf@toke.dk> <389750c6-6a31-fe80-7fa2-56fbec888534@gflclan.com>

Christian Deacon <gamemann@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hey Toke,
>
>
> That makes sense! I'm going to look into using AF_XDP sockets to achieve 
> this.
>
>
> As always, thank you for all your help!

You're welcome! :)

-Toke

References:
- Sending A Separate Packet Out The TX Path In XDP
  - From: Christian Deacon
- Re: Sending A Separate Packet Out The TX Path In XDP
  - From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
- Re: Sending A Separate Packet Out The TX Path In XDP
  - From: Christian Deacon

Prev by Date: Re: Sending A Separate Packet Out The TX Path In XDP
Next by Date: Re: AF_XDP sendto kick returning EPERM
Previous by thread: Re: Sending A Separate Packet Out The TX Path In XDP
Next by thread: AF_XDP acceleration
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Networking Development] [Fedora Linux Users] [Linux SCTP] [DCCP] [Gimp] [Yosemite Campsites]

Powered by Linux