Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 2:14 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 03:38:40PM +0100, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>> >> Hi Alexei at al.,
>> >>
>> >> I'm getting closer to finally have an xdpdump tool that uses the bpf
>> >> fentry/fexit tracepoints, but I ran into a final hurdle...
>> >>
>> >> To stuff the packet into a perf ring I'll need to use the
>> >> bpf_perf_event_output(), but unfortunately, this is a program of trace type,
>> >> and not XDP so the packet data is not added automatically :(
>> >>
>> >> Secondly even trying to pass the actual packet data as a reference to
>> >> bpf_perf_event_output() will not work as the verifier wants the data to be
>> >> on the fp.
>> >>
>> >> Even worse, the trace program gets the XDP info not thought the ctx, but
>> >> trough the fentry/fexit input value, i.e.:
>> >>
>> >> SEC("fentry/func")
>> >> int BPF_PROG(trace_on_entry, struct xdp_buff *xdp)...
>> >>
>> >> struct net_device {
>> >> int ifindex;
>> >> } __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
>> >>
>> >> struct xdp_rxq_info {
>> >> struct net_device *dev;
>> >> __u32 queue_index;
>> >> } __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
>> >>
>> >> struct xdp_buff {
>> >> void *data;
>> >> void *data_end;
>> >> void *data_meta;
>> >> void *data_hard_start;
>> >> unsigned long handle;
>> >> struct xdp_rxq_info *rxq;
>> >> } __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
>> >>
>> >> Hence even trying to copy in bytes to a local buffer is not allowed by the
>> >> verifier, i.e. __u8 *data = (u8 *)(long)xdp->data;
>> >>
>> >> Can you let me know how you envisioned a BPF entry hook to capture packets
>> >> from XDP. Am I missing something, or is there something missing from the
>> >> infrastructure?
>> >
>> > Tracing of XDP is missing a helper similar to bpf_skb_output() for skb.
>> > Its first arg will be 'struct xdp_buff *' and .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID
>> > then it will work similar to bpf_skb_output() in progs/kfree_skb.c.
>>
>> What about freplace? Since that is also using the tracing
>> infrastructure, will the replacing program also be considered a tracing
>> program by the verifier? Or is it possible to load a program with an XDP
>> type, but still use it for freplace?
>
> Please see freplace example in progs/fexit_bpf2bpf.c
> freplace is not a separate type of program.
> It's not tracing and it's not networking.
> It's an extension of the target program.
> If target prog is xdp prog the extension will have access
> to the same struct xdp_md and the same xdp helpers.
Ah, great! It would seem I had not really looked at those examples,
other than to notice they were there. Thanks for the pointer, and sorry
for being dense! :)
-Toke
|