On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 04:35:18PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 02:17:57PM +0100, Ed W wrote: > > On 20/11/2020 17:54, Seth Forshee wrote: > > >> Signed-off-by: Ed Wildgoose <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >> --- > > >> db.txt | 7 +++++-- > > >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > >> > > >> diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt > > >> index ac32483..cc5ffd0 100644 > > >> --- a/db.txt > > >> +++ b/db.txt > > >> @@ -588,13 +588,16 @@ country FR: DFS-ETSI > > >> # GB: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/136009/Ofcom-Information-Sheet-5-GHz-RLANs.pdf > > >> # GB: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0028/84970/ir-2030.pdf > > >> # GB: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0013/126121/Statement_Implementing-Ofcoms-decision-on-the-57-71GHz-band.pdf > > >> +# GB: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0036/198927/6ghz-statement.pdf > > >> country GB: DFS-ETSI > > >> (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (100 mW) > > >> (5150 - 5250 @ 80), (200 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, AUTO-BW, wmmrule=ETSI > > >> (5250 - 5350 @ 80), (100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS, AUTO-BW, wmmrule=ETSI > > >> - (5470 - 5725 @ 160), (500 mW), DFS, wmmrule=ETSI > > >> + (5470 - 5730 @ 160), (500 mW), DFS, wmmrule=ETSI > > > This looks okay to me. > > > > > >> # short range devices (ETSI EN 300 440-1) > > >> - (5725 - 5875 @ 80), (25 mW) > > >> + # See UK specific notes in ir-2030.pdf, p47 > > >> + (5725 - 5850 @ 80), (200 mW), AUTO-BW, wmmrule=ETSI > > > To echo what I said above, I'm unclear whether this change is in effect > > > yet, and based what I've seen so far I think it would need to include > > > NO-OUTDOOR. > > > > > >> + (5925 - 6425 @ 160), (250 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, AUTO-BW, wmmrule=ETSI > > > I'm also unclear on whether this change is in effect yet. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Seth > > > > > >> # 60 GHz band channels 1-6 > > >> (57000 - 71000 @ 2160), (40) > > >> > > >> -- > > >> 2.26.2 > > >> > > > > Hi all, I dropped off watching this for a while.... > > > > Seems like the update to IR2030 (GB country code regulations) was re-published last year, and the > > relevant sections are in pages 32 + 34-36 > > > > My reading of this is: > > > > - Other stuff we changed 2 years ago seems ok, caveat I'm unclear when we need to state half power > > vs using mean EIRP? > > We have to use half of the maximum EIRP in cases where TPC is required > because Linux does not support TPC. This is why 5250-5350 and 5470-5730 > have lower limits than what is prescribed in IR 2030. > > Note that many recent rules have also included power spectral density > (PSD) limits, which can also limit the max EIRP in the database since > there's currently no support for PSD limits in Linux or wireless-regdb. > Where specified in IR 2030 they do not impose any limit beyond the max > EIRP for the minimum relevant bandwidth for our purposes (20 MHz), so > they don't end up making any difference here. > > > - The 5.9-6.4Ghz range is now good for use (page 35 near the bottom), perhaps add something like: > > > > + (5925 - 6425 @ 160), (250 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, AUTO-BW, wmmrule=ETSI > > This looks about right. AUTO-BW isn't necessary since there are no > adjacent rules. It looks like this was overlooked in the beginning, then > the pattern was copied. I've updated all rules for this range to remove AUTO-BW. I think the GB rule is correct now. I did a quick check of the other rules versus IR 2030, and they look okay to me. Let me know if you see any issues I missed. Thanks, Seth _______________________________________________ wireless-regdb mailing list wireless-regdb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless-regdb
