Le 10 sept. 2013 à 19:15, Jorge Hernandez <jfha73@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > Hey guys, > > Has anybody run this test, I'm in the middle of it and have found that > PHP runs faster as CGI-nts (IIS) than Module-ts (Apache), as per > Windows Server 2008 R2 running PHP 5.5.3 x64 with Apache 2.4 x64 I was > getting benchmarks of over 15 secs, I just ran the same benchmark on > Windows Server 2012 x64 and Apache 2.4 x64 with PHP 5.5.3 x64 and got > this: > > PHP version : 5.5.3 > Platform : WINNT > -------------------------------------- > test_math : 1.093 sec. > test_stringmanipulation : 2.106 sec. > test_loops : 0.772 sec. > test_ifelse : 0.477 sec. > -------------------------------------- > Total time: : 4.448 sec. > > This doesn't make sense to me: > > Win 2008 R2 + Apache 2.4 x64 => over 15 seconds for the total time of benchmark > Win 2012 + Apache 2.4 x64 => less than 5 secs > > If both servers are using the same Apache and the same PHP, shouldn't > they be similar? > > Also, when I tried CGI over Apache I got 3.x seconds which tells me > that it should run faster on IIS (CGI-nts) > > Or: > > PHP NTS (for IIS) runs faster than TS (For Apache) even though Apache > has always been the main server for PHP. > > Any ideas? > > -- > > Jorge Hernandez Hi, As far as I know NTS version will always be faster than TS ones as handling the safety of thrreads require more treatments. Now I can't explain this difference between 2012 and 2008. perhaps 2012 is highly optimized ;-) Btw, on all bench i've made so far, IIS is always faster and more stable than apache on windows. (On heavy load tests I easily crash apache where IIS is fine) Regards, Bruno
