Hi Louis, >why can't the VC9 build be used with apache.org binaries? The build from apache.org is build with VS6. If you wanna try a VS9 build from httpd you can try the build from apachehaus.com For me it works well on Windows 2003 and Windows 7 >why is the VC9 build compiled to used the CRT as DLLs instead of static? For most windows users it is easier to enable a dll as extension than compile it ;-) >why do you have both a VC6 and a VC9 build? I guess VS6 for compability and VS9 is the future. regards Mario -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Louis Solomon [SteelBytes] [mailto:louis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Gesendet: Fr 06.02.2009 02:48 An: php-windows@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Betreff: VC6 vs VC9 Hi, based on comments on http://windows.php.net/qa/ ... why is the VC9 build compiled to used the CRT as DLLs instead of static? yet I gather the VC6 isn't? why can't the VC9 build be used with apache.org binaries? and why do you have both a VC6 and a VC9 build? just curious. Louis -- PHP Windows Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
