Re: Native libpq.so instead of libpq.dll?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Gert van den Berg
<wine-users@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> O Java, where using the wrong version won't find you without an
> "interpreter" (er... "runtime environment") for most operating
> systems... (Mono does .NET 2.0 IIRC)

Mono does 3.5, and support for 4.0 is in development.

Of course, when working with any language that requires a "runtime
environment", it's a good idea to check what's in the stock install of
various operating systems and choose a version requirement based on
what people are likely to have.

>From what I can tell, Java is not included at all in a stock Ubuntu
install or in a stock Windows install.



[Index of Archives]     [Gimp for Windows]     [Red Hat]     [Samba]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Graphics Cards]     [Wine Home]

  Powered by Linux