Re: Native libpq.so instead of libpq.dll?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Native libpq.so instead of libpq.dll?
From: "Cigydd" <wineforum-user@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 15:56:18 -0500
In-reply-to: <1279294330.m2f.46331@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1279294330.m2f.46331@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1279468156.m2f.46420@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx

This means that my view of cross-platform programming has still remained a bit naïve until now. 
If I understand well there must be some "convertor" or intermediary, say, layer, maybe library. And is this what WINE does in particular?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Native libpq.so instead of libpq.dll?
  - From: Vincent Povirk
- Re: Native libpq.so instead of libpq.dll?
  - From: vitamin

References:
- Native libpq.so instead of libpq.dll?
  - From: Cigydd
- Re: Native libpq.so instead of libpq.dll?
  - From: vitamin

Prev by Date: Re: cannot load setup.exe/Office 2007 under bin32-wine
Next by Date: Re: DirectX troubles - Running Civilisation IV: Beyond the Sword
Previous by thread: Re: Native libpq.so instead of libpq.dll?
Next by thread: Re: Native libpq.so instead of libpq.dll?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Gimp for Windows] [Red Hat] [Samba] [Yosemite Camping] [Graphics Cards] [Wine Home]

Powered by Linux