Re: Distribution for Cutting Edge Wine Testing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Well with a pretty recent distro, it usually does fine. I have dapper systems at home that build wine fine and dapper is going on 2 years old now.

Take that to mean what you will. I can tell you from experience that wine builds well on Debian unstable/testing and Ubuntu's back to Dapper. Beyond that, I don't know much more than that.

-Zac

Dmitryi & Elf wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 17:28:40 -0500, Zac Brown <zac@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

I think I misunderstood your question. If you're worried about getting the latest snapshot/unstable release etc, then you're best bet is to play in git or building source releases as they're released.

It's more a matter of "dependency hell" in the stable Debian version. Stable Debian dependency libs usually don't keep up with cutting-edge devel releases like Wine. And yes, that'd require building Wine from source.

IMHO, wine is a dish best served fresh. Improvements are made quickly in wine so distro's aren't able to keep up. I suppose if you want your distro to worry bout these things SourceMage or Gentoo might be the freshest? Don't quote me on that though.

For what you're asking, you're better off just building releases as they come out by hand or just rebuilding a git checkout as you go.

-Zac


[Index of Archives]     [Gimp for Windows]     [Red Hat]     [Samba]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Graphics Cards]     [Wine Home]

  Powered by Linux