On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 9:43 AM, David Gerard <dgerard@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 06/04/2008, DARKGuy . <dark.guy.2008@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I figured that with the latest WINE (compiled from source, it took a > > damn half hour) > > You kids with your fast modern CPUs. I remember compiling > OpenOffice.org on FreeBSD five years ago (and it *still* didn't work - > I ended up using the Linux binary under emulation) and it taking four > days ... > > Half an hour! Can you give half an hour of your time to the Wine > project, and crumble just one more stone out from under the Monopoly? > Please, give your CPU time so that they may grow! > > > - d. >_> I'm not a kid neither my processor is "modern". It's a Pentium 4 bought in 2006, and before that I had a Pentium 3 933Mhz for crying out loud! it costed me 3 months of work to get the processor+motherboard+memory -_-... A compilation that takes 4 days @_@ you have huge patience... I would've stopped it the first 4-6 hours =/... I can give half an hour to the WINE project, but I can't when I'm short on time. Right now I'm not but when I wrote the email I was, so I had to resort to use an ugly avian alternative instead. Some stuff in Linux isn't just apt-get or pacman or ./configure && make (which took 30 times longer). However, I'm willing to provide any information needed in order to get this program to work :).
