Re: Forum vs Mailing lists - by the numbers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 10:37:30 -0500
Jeremy White <jwhite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> So, if we look at January, the last month without the forum:
>   http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-users/2008-January/thread.html
> we had 226 posts.
> 
> If we look at March, the first full month with the forum:
>   http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-users/2008-March/thread.html
> we had 2136 posts.
> 
> Even if you say that 1,000 of those posts were meta posts with complaints from
> us Mailman lovers, that's still at least a 5 fold increase in traffic.
> 
> I found that compelling, so I thought I would share.
> 
> I've long had a strong bias for mailing lists, but I think this
> is an important lesson for me to accept.  If we want to engage and
> embrace all visitors to Wine - not just the ones that think as I do -
> we need to make sure the forums are strong and work well.
> 
> Sigh.  First Wikis, now forums.  What's next?  Am I going to have to twitter
> and text message with my thumbs?  </grumpy old man>
> <grin>
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Jeremy

yeah, nowadays most people below 30 don't use email anymore, its sad.

-- 
Marcel W. Wysocki <maci@xxxxxxxxxx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-users/attachments/20080403/121ad541/attachment.pgp 

[Index of Archives]     [Gimp for Windows]     [Red Hat]     [Samba]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Graphics Cards]     [Wine Home]

  Powered by Linux