On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 18:14:41 +0000 (UTC), Daniel Skorka wrote: > Exeter <Exeter@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> So this is what usenet needs. A group that did not have flames >> having flames brought to them by a "private subscription" mailing >> list. > > Usenet always had flames. And this group has had a low flame rate. > As for bringing them to this NG: All your posts to this group that > Google Groups can find are bordering on being such themselves. Since I seldom post to this group from this account you would be talking about the three posts in this thread is that correct? Just which parts of those posts do you consider to be flames, or is any complaint a falme? > > Daniel _______________________________________________ wine-users mailing list wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
