Francesco Pietra wrote: > very helpful clarification, thank you np :) Mike Hearn wrote: > Microsofts implementation is more modular than ours, fewer DLLS does not > necessarily equal less complete. We've also taken some shortcuts where > binary compatibility could be preserved with a simpler system. Thanks for clearing that up :). _______________________________________________ wine-users mailing list wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
