On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 09:00:11 +0200, Molle Bestefich wrote: > I've downloaded DCOM98 from MS and opened the .exe with WinRar, > comparing each DLL file with the index of Wine DLLs at > http://source.winehq.org/source/dlls/. Far from all of them are > there, but then again some of them are probably extremely rarely used > by applications. Microsofts implementation is more modular than ours, fewer DLLS does not necessarily equal less complete. We've also taken some shortcuts where binary compatibility could be preserved with a simpler system. To answer the original question, yes Wines DCOM should be "good enough" for most users who don't need wire compatibility, and it's getting better all the time. _______________________________________________ wine-users mailing list wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
