--- Brad Fuller <brad@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > M-Halo wrote: > > >--- "James E. LaBarre" <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > >>>On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 08:27 -0800, Duane Clark > >>> > >>> > >>wrote: > >> > >> > >>>>(You need to hit "Reply-all" so that responses > go > >>>> > >>>> > >>to the list, instead > >> > >> > >>>>of just to me.) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>Sorry, The Fedora list mail comes "from" the > list, > >>> > >>> > >>so I never check the > >> > >> > >>>to in the reply. > >>> > >>> > >>I just wish you folks would stop whining when you > >>get a message that should > >>have gone to the list. As long as the list > insists > >>upon varying from > >>*expected* behavior (regardless on whether or not > >>it's correct), you must > >>expect to get misdirected messages. > >> > >> > > > >No whining. Sometimes people forget, and you have > to > >remind them about this or send the message back to > the > >alias. Personally, unless the conversation leads > to > >something offline (from the alias), I prefer to > keep > >the message in the alias' eyes. > > > > > Why does this mailing list do that? Can't it be > configured like most > other lists for reply to: wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx > > I often forget to look at the To: to see who it's > going to --- I just > assume that when I hit "reply" the msg will go back > to the list (as it > should. it is a "distribution list" after all) *shrugs* I don't think incoming messages are filtered through anything so that "wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx" is appended to every "from" field. :S In any case, I'm just a user of the alias; I have no ideas what the guts look like! :) Hiji __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail _______________________________________________ wine-users mailing list wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
