I haven't been following this very closely, suppose I might as well drop in my 2c. :) I'm on several lists......this and one other list are the *only* ones that don't include the [listname] and set reply-to the list, and frankly I never understood why. I've always viewed lists as sort of an e-mail forum, and replying to posts is in a sense like replying to forum posts. Dropping in the [listname] and also doing the reply-to thing help keep threads and the public forum style intact, IMO. I suspect the default-to-replying-to-sender tends to encourage back-channel chatter, and stifles public discussion. Whenever I post a reply to this group, invariably I end up doing some copying and pasting, as I want to make the message reply *only* to the list. Also the [listname] would make it a cinch to filter messages to various folders (although I don't do this myself actually). I like to see the list name so I know immediately "where we are" so to speak.....without it, the message could be a personal e-mail, spam, or any other list that doesn't append the list name. Small gripe, sure. -Matt Bailey _______________________________________________ wine-users mailing list wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
