in all fairness... lets remember that this is a WINE list, and not a gripe-about-email-crap list. i motion that the wine list admin read those links, and make up his/her own mind, and we never have to hear about it again. -=o) i hope i didnt step on any toes here, but i, as a list subscriber, would most want my list to be *on topic*, and that means wine. not whine. shaun On Fri, 2004-06-25 at 09:16, James E. LaBarre wrote: > > Hmm, I think a short intro as to why Reply-To list is not set by default > > is in order. From my experience in the past, this option causes more > > pain than joy, and is generally a bad move. I'll also mention that > > people who request this option almost always are the same people who > > don't set up a mail filter to file mailing list messages into a > > different folder. > > > > This is a summary of "http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html"; > > > Ah yes, people *love* to trumpet out that rant every chance they get. > I'll see you that rant and raise you one reply at > http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml _______________________________________________ wine-users mailing list wine-users@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-users
