Changelog: * wwn/wn19990927_10.xml, wwn/wn20001023_66.xml, wwn/wn20010611_97.xml, wwn/wn20010718_100.xml, wwn/wn20020224_116.xml, wwn/wn20020308_117.xml, wwn/wn20030919_188.xml, wwn/wn20030926_189.xml Assorted spelling and case fixes -- Francois Gouget fgouget@free.fr http://fgouget.free.fr/ Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry, he'll be a mile away - and barefoot.
Index: wwn/wn19990927_10.xml =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/lostwages/wwn/wn19990927_10.xml,v retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.4 wn19990927_10.xml --- wwn/wn19990927_10.xml 4 Sep 2003 15:39:16 -0000 1.4 +++ wwn/wn19990927_10.xml 13 Sep 2003 10:45:51 -0000 @@ -231,8 +231,8 @@ archive="http://www.integrita.com/cgi-local/lwgate.pl/WINE-DEVEL/archives/1999-09/Subject/article-337.html"; > -Adam Sacarny installed on Winehq a prototype of "The Vineyard", an extension -of Winehq <quote who="Adam Sacarny">website that would be home for News, the daily +Adam Sacarny installed on WineHQ a prototype of "The Vineyard", an extension +of WineHQ <quote who="Adam Sacarny">website that would be home for News, the daily builds maintained by me and Jean-Louis Thirot, and TkWine. The major focus of the site would be News and Discussions, although it would have other news sections.</quote> Index: wwn/wn20001023_66.xml =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/lostwages/wwn/wn20001023_66.xml,v retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.4 wn20001023_66.xml --- wwn/wn20001023_66.xml 4 Sep 2003 15:53:36 -0000 1.4 +++ wwn/wn20001023_66.xml 13 Sep 2003 10:46:01 -0000 @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ <p /> <ul> - <li>Winehq has now a full featured search engine (where you can look + <li>WineHQ has now a full featured search engine (where you can look up for old mails, patches, WWN articles and more...). Have a look at <a href="http://www.winehq.com/search.html";> http://www.winehq.com/search.html</a></li> Index: wwn/wn20010611_97.xml =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/lostwages/wwn/wn20010611_97.xml,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.5 wn20010611_97.xml --- wwn/wn20010611_97.xml 25 Jul 2003 18:45:03 -0000 1.5 +++ wwn/wn20010611_97.xml 13 Sep 2003 10:46:12 -0000 @@ -17,11 +17,11 @@ floppy drive crashes, and very nearly some mountain bike crashes it's been an exciting week. </p> -<p>Last week Codeweavers announced support for Windows browser plug-ins by using Wine. +<p>Last week CodeWeavers announced support for Windows browser plug-ins by using Wine. A nice little article can be found at <a href="http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=5463";> http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=5463</a>. In particular -it mentions support for Quicktime and Shockwave Director and the ability to use this +it mentions support for QuickTime and Shockwave Director and the ability to use this in an embedded environment. </p> <p>In the CVS tree, work is continuing on improved window manager support, various @@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ comments. We will be spending the rest of the day getting the initial category structure and 1st round off applications in. Once we have enough input, and we fell stable enough, I will link the AppDB to -Winehq.com and post to wine-users.</p> +WineHQ.com and post to wine-users.</p> <p><a href="http://appdb.winehq.com/";>http://appdb.winehq.com/</a></p> Index: wwn/wn20010718_100.xml =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/lostwages/wwn/wn20010718_100.xml,v retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.2 wn20010718_100.xml --- wwn/wn20010718_100.xml 12 Jun 2003 20:48:20 -0000 1.2 +++ wwn/wn20010718_100.xml 19 Jul 2003 15:42:18 -0000 @@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ <p>Lionel Ulmer replied:</p> <quote who="Lionel Ulmer"><p> -My first question was : why implement it ? I would personnaly find VERY +My first question was : why implement it ? I would personally find VERY annoying to have any Windows app. change the size of my desktop window when I prefer running my applications 'windowed'.</p> Index: wwn/wn20020224_116.xml =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/lostwages/wwn/wn20020224_116.xml,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.5 wn20020224_116.xml --- wwn/wn20020224_116.xml 4 Sep 2003 15:53:36 -0000 1.5 +++ wwn/wn20020224_116.xml 1 Oct 2003 10:07:58 -0000 @@ -568,7 +568,7 @@ the best solution.</p> <p>But we need a reasonable T.</p> <p>I think a T of six months to one year is probably about right, with six months - better then one year. This gives investing companies an opportunity to recover + better than one year. This gives investing companies an opportunity to recover their investment and still insures that the community gets the code, albeit a little bit later then they do under the conventional GPL. </p> Index: wwn/wn20020308_117.xml =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/lostwages/wwn/wn20020308_117.xml,v retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.8 wn20020308_117.xml --- wwn/wn20020308_117.xml 5 Sep 2003 14:30:55 -0000 1.8 +++ wwn/wn20020308_117.xml 13 Sep 2003 10:46:21 -0000 @@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ </p><p> If you notice any other issues that I am not aware of, please let me know. There is a lot of things to a site that has been running as long - as Winehq.com has. + as WineHQ.com has. </p></quote> <p>There was no reply, which is probably a good thing.</p> Index: wwn/wn20030919_188.xml =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/lostwages/wwn/wn20030919_188.xml,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -u -r1.1 wn20030919_188.xml --- wwn/wn20030919_188.xml 19 Sep 2003 16:48:11 -0000 1.1 +++ wwn/wn20030919_188.xml 1 Oct 2003 07:31:30 -0000 @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ <p>Sylvain Petreolle asked what version of Wine he was running. Philipp reported it was the latest CVS. Roderick Colenbrander -jumped in an diagnosed the problem, +jumped in and diagnosed the problem, <quote who="Roderick Colenbrander"> The problem you have is a bug in the dga code of the ati drivers. To workaround the problem set the option UseDGA to N in your config file. The strange @@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ </quote></p> <p> Shachar Shemesh had an idea how memory use could be tracked but -it involved Changing the way Wine allocates memory :</p> +it involved changing the way Wine allocates memory :</p> <quote who="Shachar Shemesh"><p> Something else that might help is an algorithm I suggested a long time ago, and which was not thought as worth the effort. Since I have not Index: wwn/wn20030926_189.xml =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/lostwages/wwn/wn20030926_189.xml,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -u -r1.1 wn20030926_189.xml --- wwn/wn20030926_189.xml 26 Sep 2003 03:58:09 -0000 1.1 +++ wwn/wn20030926_189.xml 1 Oct 2003 07:50:51 -0000 @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ <topic>Filesystems</topic> <p>Alexandre's work on NTDLL/Kernel32 DLL separation was kicked into high gear a few weeks ago. Much work has been done. Eric -Pouech has been relatively quiet though in this latest round. +Pouech has been relatively quiet through in this latest round. He wrote in to give an update on what he's concentrating on:</p> <quote who="Eric Pouech"><p> @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ I was working on the NtCreateFile implementation. </p><p> Even, if it's not ready for prime time, I've been running lots of apps -since once week without issues (which doesn't mean that none are left). +since one week without issues (which doesn't mean that none are left). You'll find attached the patch for review. (Since Alexandre has been busy lately, better to share some info) </p><p> @@ -119,10 +119,11 @@ <li> beef up the device server object to store this information (unix device name, fake label, fake serial number).</li> </ul></p><p> -The later is in fact more suited for an evolution of the current server +The latter is in fact more suited for an evolution of the current server device object. </p><p> My final question is more on which order we go on: +</p><p> Solution 1: <ol> <li> get the NtCreateFile ready and include it in the tree</li> @@ -131,7 +132,7 @@ <li> convert the file/paths related functions</li></ol></li> <li> finish the server side objects (devices...)</li></ol> </p><p> -Solution 1: +Solution 2: <ul> 3. <br /> 1 <br /> @@ -189,7 +190,7 @@ </code></ul></p><p> is only slightly longer. </p><p> -Why must wines command line options be removed though? They are often +Why must wine's command line options be removed though? They are often handy for testing things out. </p></quote> @@ -239,7 +240,7 @@ than having no information at all. There are better places to put such info: man pages, web pages (WineHQ), etc. Having it duplicated somewhere in the depths of these manuals serves no -purpose then to create more (and useless) work for us. +purpose than to create more (and useless) work for us. </p><p> Third, we have to try to make these things look as books, and less likely a motley collection of files, interlaced with @@ -259,7 +260,7 @@ fun to rehash this stuff because who knows how many folks are just tuning in. Simple question: </p><quote who="flyker"> -<p>Can i compile my program to executable file that can be run without wine ? +<p>Can i compile my program to an executable file that can be run without wine ? </p></quote> @@ -268,7 +269,7 @@ <p>That prompted the original person to reach an epiphany:</p> <quote who="flyker"><p> -Hmmm.... Than i don't see any reason to compile program using winelib. +Hmmm.... Then i don't see any reason to compile program using winelib. What is the difference between <ul><code> wine program.exe</code></ul> @@ -304,7 +305,7 @@ Wine from the equation:</p> <quote who="Shachar Shemesh"><p> -A Win32 program needs Win32 environment. Be that a registry, the Win32 +A Win32 program needs a Win32 environment. Be that a registry, the Win32 APIs, or a forest directory structure and "My Documents" and "Program Files". While you may theoretically get the APIs by statically linking the DLLs into the executable, all of the rest are only available if Wine @@ -315,7 +316,7 @@ is such a minor part of the grand scheme of things, that I don't see any reason to even attempt it. </p><p> -As things stand, and it's certanly what I'm recommending to people - if +As things stand, and it's certainly what I'm recommending to people - if all you want is to have your program function on an i386 Linux - just make sure the same PE works on Wine.</p></quote> @@ -332,11 +333,11 @@ surely, maybe never being completed but along the way getting sufficient integration for it not to matter.</p></quote> -<p>Michael Stefaniuc mentioned that a app ported with Winelib is also +<p>Michael Stefaniuc mentioned that an app ported with Winelib is also capable of running on non-x86 machines. (At least in theory.) That's a pretty good summary of this topic. No one mentioned speed as a reason for using Winelib, the reason being is that there really isn't any -difference. So the short answer is.. Winelib has it's +difference. So the short answer is... Winelib has it's advantages but it's probably not for the reasons you think. </p> </section>
